The simmering property dispute within the family of former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy has escalated into a full-blown public feud, with his mother Vijayamma filing a notarised affidavit in court making serious allegations against her son.
What was earlier seen as a private disagreement between siblings has now taken a deeply political and personal turn. YS Sharmila has consistently alleged that her rightful share of family assets is being denied. However, the latest affidavit indicates that the dispute is no longer limited to her claims, with Vijayamma now directly contradicting Jagan’s position.
What the Affidavit Says
In her strongly worded submission, Vijayamma made several key assertions:
| Key Assertion | Details |
|---|---|
| Joint Family Properties | All assets held until the death of YS Rajasekhara Reddy (YSR) in 2009 are combined family properties and were never formally divided. |
| YSR’s Intention | YSR’s clear intention was for assets to be distributed equally among the four grandchildren, a fact known to close associates. |
| MoU Not Honored | Jagan had acknowledged Sharmila’s rightful share through an MoU but failed to honour it in letter and spirit. |
| Excluded Assets | Significant assets, including Saraswati Cement and land in Yelahanka, were excluded from the MoU despite rightfully belonging to Sharmila. |
| Dividend Only | The money given to Sharmila was only dividend income from her share, not a final settlement. |
| Unfair Treatment | Vijayamma accused Jagan of unfair treatment not just towards Sharmila but also towards her grandchildren. |
A Pointed Remark to Jagan
In a direct appeal to her son, Vijayamma said, “the truth is known to my God and my son,” indicating that Jagan is fully aware of the situation. She also urged him to stop what she described as “false propaganda” about the dispute.
The affidavit concluded with a solemn assertion that every statement made was true and declared in the name of God, intensifying the ongoing family feud and placing Jagan at odds with both his sister and mother.
Background: A Growing Rift
The property dispute has been simmering for some time, with Sharmila consistently alleging that her rightful share of family assets is being denied. While the disagreement was initially viewed as a private family matter, it has now burst into the public domain.
The latest development raises the political stakes as well. Both Jagan and Sharmila are significant political figures in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, and the public airing of family grievances could have implications beyond the immediate property dispute.
What’s Next?
With Vijayamma’s affidavit now on record, the legal and political dimensions of the dispute are likely to intensify. Jagan’s response to the allegations, both in court and in the public sphere, will be closely watched
